点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
重庆忠县：三峡橘乡田园综合体赋能乡村振兴******
中新网重庆1月11日电 (记者 何蓬磊)记者从10日下午举行的忠县全面推进乡村振兴新闻发布会上获悉，自2020年底重庆市唯一一个国家级田园综合体——三峡橘乡田园综合体(以下简称：田园综合体)开园以来，目前运行情况良好，发挥着“国家级田园综合体佼佼者、乡村振兴示范园”的示范带动作用。
据悉，三峡橘乡田园综合体位于忠县新立镇，既是全国首批18个国家级田园综合体试点项目之一，也是三峡库区和重庆市唯一一个国家级田园综合体。项目重点依托柑橘种植业和加工业，打造乡村旅游目的地，推动一、二、三产业和农业、文化、旅游产业深度融合发展。
资料图为游客在三峡橘乡田园综合体的三峡柑橘文化时空馆参观。 何蓬磊 摄据忠县人民政府副县长田长忠介绍，田园综合体建成投运后，资金、人才、科技投入农业迎来黄金期。项目区100%的农户参与股权化改革，集体经济和群众收入大幅提升，农作物耕种收机械化率85%；智慧农业项目占全县的80%；电商数量和业务量均居全县第一，农产品商品化率达70%，农产品加工增值率全县第一，农民人均收入居全县第一，形成了高效、优质、安全、环保的农业体系。
“春闻橘香夏赏荷，秋收彩稻冬采橘……三峡橘乡田园综合体已成为热门打卡地。”田长忠介绍说，田园综合体休闲旅游人气集聚作用明显。去年以来，重庆多所高校以及中小学校将三峡橘乡田园综合体作为实践教学基地，累计接待学生8000余人次；2022年，累计接待各级考察团队200余起，接待社会游客70余万人次。
值得一提的是，以柑橘为重点的特色产业是忠县最大特色亮点。数据显示，忠县柑橘产业面积36万余亩，产量39万吨，实现综合产值40亿元以上，并建成“中国柑橘城”和国家级柑橘交易中心。
“目前，忠县基本建成三峡橘乡国家级田园综合体，正高水平打造三峡库心·长江盆景区域协同发展示范片，以独珠江村等48个美丽乡村建设为全域示范和具体抓手，加快推动宜居宜业和美丽乡村建设。”田长忠说。(完)
中新网评：美国众议长选举“连续剧”暴露美式民主痼疾****** 中新网北京1月9日电(蒋鲤)在15轮投票表决后，美国众议院议长选举这场“连续剧”终于落下帷幕，众议院共和党领袖凯文•麦卡锡最终成功当选第55任美国众议院议长。这是美国国会过去164年来耗时最久的一次议长选举记录，将美国“对抗式民主”的弊端暴露无遗。  资料图：美国众议院共和党领袖麦卡锡。中新社记者 沙晗汀 摄由于两党对立加剧、党派内斗、利益分配不均等因素，众议长选举陷入一场拉锯战。在此次众议长竞选中，美国民主党议员继续抱团，多轮投票中，一票不投麦卡锡，共和党右翼“强硬派”领头的约20人小团体也拒绝投票麦卡锡。 麦卡锡的当选之路一波三折，除了本人的“政治投机派”角色在国会不受欢迎外，与共和党内部政治分歧关系密切。 一方面，共和党党内反对者认为，麦卡锡对民主党态度过于软弱，无力对抗民主党控制的参议院和拜登政府，另一方面，因为共和党的多数优势微弱，党内一些影响力较小的派系的政治力量则被放大，有利于他们巩固自己的选票。 此外，党内反对者也认为，自己的选票没有换取更多利益，希望以此作为筹码换取麦卡锡更大的让步，比如让他们获得众议院重要委员会中的职务。 作为仅次于美国总统、副总统的政坛三号人物，众议院议长通常由众议院多数党领袖担任，选举几乎没有悬念。然而，麦卡锡此次为当选，不得不做出多个关键让步，其中可能包括恢复一项罢黜议长动议机制，使得众议长的权力被削弱，难以掌控众议院。 美国有线电视新闻网CNN称，麦卡锡在这场不合时宜的政治勒索中作出让步，这种绥靖政策只会让极端主义势力更加强大。 这场引发全世界围观的尴尬选举暴露出美国政治存在严重的对立和分化。在权力博弈思维的裹挟下，党派利益凌驾于国家和人民利益之上，美国两党相互拆台，陷入“为反对而反对”的无脑对垒。而即便是一党内，也会因为利益分配问题产生不同的小派系，相互对抗，选票变成了谋利益的工具。 从国会山骚乱到打破记历史记录的15轮众议长选举，“对抗式民主”让美国政治陷入瓶颈，长期对抗势必会让政客们丧失客观公正的判断能力，其政治阶层是否有能力治理国家也会引发质疑。 两党之争和党派内斗进一步放大了美国政治体制弊病，美国所谓的“民主”形象，让全世界大跌眼镜。鼓吹以选民利益为先的美式选举，变成了政客们利益置换的游戏，进一步彰显出美国“民主政治”日渐失能，不断极化的党争已使美国政治制度陷入死循环。  House speaker election reveals deep-rooted problems in U.S. democracy (ECNS) -- The Republican leader Kevin McCarthy was elected as the 55th speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives after 15 ballots. As the most grueling House speaker election in the past 164 years, the election has highlighted the defects of the country’s "confrontational democracy". The election once reached a stalemate due to intense partisan strife, inner-party struggle among the Republicans, uneven distribution of interests, and more. Democratic Party members forged a close alliance, refusing to vote for McCarthy, while about 20 Republicans also declined to cast ballots for the GOP leader. Except for his unpopular role as a "political speculator" in Congress, McCarthy’s hard-won election can be attributed to turmoil within the Republican Party. On the one hand, opponents in the Republican Party believe that the GOP leader's attitude toward the Democrats is too weak to confront the Senate controlled by Democrats and the Biden administration. On the other hand, the political power of some less influential factions in the Republican Party has been amplified due to the Party’s weak majority advantage in the House of Representatives, which is conducive to consolidating their ticket warehouses. Meanwhile, these opponents believe that their votes failed to win them more benefits, hoping to use this as a bargaining chip for McCarthy's further concessions, such as getting them positions in important House Committees. As the third political figure after the President and Vice President of the U.S., the speaker, by tradition, is the head of the majority party in the House of Representatives. But McCarthy has made many concessions in order to bring the ultra conservatives along, involving what’s known as the “motion to vacate,” a mechanism by which members can force a vote to depose the speaker. The reported concessions will empower individual members at the expense of McCarthy’s sway as speaker. CNN thought the concessions he made during this unseemly political shakedown would only make the extremist faction more powerful. This embarrassing election, which has drawn global attention, exposed the serious opposition and polarization in American politics. Both Democrats and Republicans put their interests before that of the country and its people, attacking and opposing each other irrationally. Besides, different factions arise within a single party and confront each other because of the distribution of interests. Votes have become a tool to win more benefits. From Capitol riots to the House Speaker election with record-breaking ballots, "confrontational democracy" has become a bottleneck of American politics. Long-term confrontation will surely impede politicians to think objectively and fairly while their capacity of governing the country will also raise doubts among the public. Both parties’ struggle and infighting among the Republicans have further amplified the defects of the American political system, with its "democratic" image shocking the world. The U.S.-style election, which advocates putting voters' interests first, has become a game of interest exchange among politicians. In addition, it further demonstrates the malfunction of American "democratic politics" and the constantly polarized party struggle that has trapped the American political system into an infinite cycle. 
|
)